9/27, 12:46 PM

Korean shipbuilders are reportedly winning record orders for very large crude carriers, and it doesn't seem to be just because the ships are old. Why are orders piling up right now?

2026-09-27


Causal mechanism: not aging ships, but a shortage of vessels that can "sail legitimately"

Today's report briefly noted that global newbuild orders for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) this year reached 217 vessels, surpassing the 2006 record to set an all-time high. The actual figures are even steeper. Crude tanker newbuild contracts in 2026 have already reached 60 million DWT, or 234 vessels, the strongest year on record, and VLCCs alone account for 151 vessels, more than double the full-year 2025 order volume. First-quarter contracts alone exceeded $20 billion, the fastest pace of ordering since 1973 (Splash247/BairdMaritime, 2026).

The real cause of this ordering surge is not aging but a "fleet split" caused by sanctions. About 100 VLCCs are currently under formal sanctions, and adding roughly 100 more vessels that have carried sanctioned cargo means about 23% of the global VLCC fleet is effectively excluded from normal market trading (Splash247, 2026). When the VLCC orderbook stood at about 15% of the existing fleet, the share of sanctioned vessels was about 18%, and the key point is that these two numbers nearly match. Shipowners are effectively replacing vessels rendered unusable by sanctions one-for-one with newbuilds.

Aging pressure adds to this. The number of vessels aged 16-20 years has grown from about 750 in early 2018 to more than 2,200 today, and by the time the current orderbook is fully delivered, 29.6% of the VLCC fleet and 32.7% of the Suezmax fleet will be over 20 years old (AXSMarine, 2026). The International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) rules are forcing these older vessels to slow steam, so less efficient ships were already facing earlier retirement.

The final trigger is the Iran war. With the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz disrupting normal operations, VLCC rates soared to about $175,000 per day in the first quarter (BairdMaritime, 2026). Separate from the oil price decline noted in today's report, when rates jump this much, the return-on-investment calculation for newbuild orders changes completely for shipowners.

Why all three factors converged now

FactorDetails
Sanctions isolationAbout 23% of the VLCC fleet is out of normal trading due to sanctions, nearly matching the size of the orderbook
Pressure to retire aging shipsShare of vessels over 20 years old expands to 29.6% by the time orders are delivered; CII forces slow steaming
Record freight ratesHormuz blockade pushes VLCC daily rates to about $175,000 (Q1)

The windfall for Korea's big three shipbuilders

HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering, Samsung Heavy Industries, and Hanwha Ocean have won 7, 4, and 10 new VLCC orders this year, respectively (The Public, 2026). Saturation at Chinese shipyards is also cited as a factor steering more orders to Korea. Large shipyards at home and abroad have filled their building docks through just before 2030 with high-priced tanker contracts, so this boom could physically last until at least 2029 (Nate News, 2026).

A historical warning: supercycles have usually ended in busts

The 2003-2008 shipbuilding supercycle also collapsed after excessive ordering, with a flood of deliveries in 2010-2012, and the industry took nearly a decade to absorb it. Some argue, however, that this cycle is structured differently. Global shipbuilding capacity is currently about 5% of the total fleet, far smaller than in 2008 (about 14%) (compiled from related research, 2026). In other words, with building capacity itself limited, it is relatively harder for oversupply to spread as quickly as in the past. Still, it is worth noting that a large portion of these orders stemmed from a political variable: sanctions. If sanctions on Iran and Russia are eased and the shadow fleet returns to the regular market, the demand base itself could be shaken just as the newbuilds ordered now are delivered.

So what should investors do?

Korea's big three shipbuilders have docks filled through 2029, giving high near-term earnings visibility. But because the root of this boom is "fleet replacement driven by sanctions" rather than "rising transport demand," investors should watch for progress toward an end to the Iran war or in sanctions-easing talks. If ceasefire negotiations take concrete shape, the shadow fleet could normalize and the new-order frenzy could cool first; conversely, the longer the geopolitical stalemate lasts, the longer the current ordering rally could run. Holders of shipbuilding stocks should check both whether growth in the new order backlog slows in quarterly earnings and whether VLCC rates peak and turn lower, so as not to miss the next cycle's turning point.

Sources: VLCC newbuild bonanza smashes two-decade-old annual record in just six months, VLCC orders top $20b in biggest buying spree in 25 years, The Aging Tanker Fleet: Causes, Market Impact, and What's Next, Chinese shipyard saturation hands Korean shipbuilders a windfall… Hanwha Ocean wins 10 VLCC orders, "Biggest boom in 20 years"… Global newbuild VLCC orders top 217 in 2026



Related Questions